A general ceasefire constrained the opposing armies while the reach of negotiations and the southern frontier remained contested.
What agreement was signed at Rhodes?
The general ceasefire study explains the March 11 instrument. It applied to forces under the signatories’ command, prohibited advances and facilitated UN observers. It was distinct from the later armistice. Its civilian crossing clause was a restriction requiring mutual agreement, not an expulsion order.1
What did משה שרת MOŜE SHARETT tell the American ambassador?
The March 11 dispatch records his denial that Israeli forces had crossed the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan’s frontier or intended to take Aqaba. It also records British warnings and a request for observers. These are attributed diplomatic positions; the Palmach account’s movement through Egyptian territory remains a separate evidentiary complication.23
Did every listed objective become a secure daily event?
The Ein Gedi page’s related-site catalog dates records for טאבא TABA and אי האלמוגים CORAL ISLAND to March 11, but the available metadata does not establish a complete operation, its actors or casualties. They remain lesser reported catalog leads here rather than independently dated major studies. This source limit does not leave the day empty: the signed ceasefire provides its substantial event.4
How is this dated?
This is Day 468 of the 599-day civil-date series, 1949-03-11. The date register’s fixed-Hebrew daytime conversion is י׳ באדר ה׳תש״ט 10th 𝑜𝑓 Adar, AM 5709; after sunset it is י״א באדר ה׳תש״ט 11th 𝑜𝑓 Adar, AM 5709. This route identifies the daily recap. It does not assign earlier occurrences, evening movements, cumulative counts or later newspaper issues to the daytime Hebrew date. The cited source dates and reconstructed clocks are distinguished in the sections above and in the linked major studies.5
Guided reflections
- Why did command authority matter for including the Iraqi front in the ceasefire?
- How would observers test the competing claims about foreign-frontier crossings?
Footnotes
- FRUS 1949 VI, document 528, Clauses 1–5 and reservation. ↩
- FRUS 1949 VI, document 529, Complaints, replies and observer request. ↩
- Palmach, Negev Brigade in Operation Uvda, Egyptian route. ↩
- Military heritage map, Ein Gedi, Related-site catalog lists Taba and Coral Island on March 11; their direct pages remain unrecovered. ↩
- FRUS 1949 VI, document 528, Dated source and evidence limits identified above. ↩
Works cited
- FRUS 1949 VI, document 528. Official digital edition of contemporary diplomatic record. Source-given conversation, document and transmission dates distinguished. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1949v06/d528. Accessed October 11, 2026.
- FRUS 1949 VI, document 529. Official digital edition of contemporary diplomatic record. Source-given conversation, document and transmission dates distinguished. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1949v06/d529. Accessed October 11, 2026.
- Palmach, Negev Brigade in Operation Uvda. Later institutional operational history in Hebrew. Embedded commanders’ message is a later reproduction; original operational orders, telegram and logs unheld. https://palmach.org.il/history/database/?itemId=8508. Accessed October 11, 2026.
- Military heritage map, Ein Gedi. Later military heritage reconstruction, recovered indexed web text after direct redirect failures. Metadata and narrative distinguished; underlying operational documents uncollated. https://moreshet-map.org.il/step-5/מבצע-עובדה/עין-גדי/. Accessed October 11, 2026.