Maariv's special edition of 7 June 1967 announced the return to הר הבית HAR HAʾBAYIT through the language of Zion. A front-page reproduction accompanying Shlomo Man's 2016 review shows the newspaper's masthead, issue date, special-edition label, and time 16:30 together with the headline. Its wording linked the military achievement to a Jewish national and sacred geography.1
The choice of Zion made the headline more than an announcement of a unit's location. For עם ישראל AM YISRAʾEL, הר הבית HAR HAʾBAYIT belongs to the remembered and living center of national history. The flag could signify the restoration of Jewish power at a place from which Jewish access had been excluded under Jordanian rule. The liberation of the Old City and renewed access to הכותל HAʾKOTEL gave that language a concrete setting.2
Man draws attention to the editor's choice of Zion where the state's name might have appeared. That is his interpretation of a visible wording choice, not testimony from the editor about a private intention. He also observes that the special edition used an archive photograph: an image on a front page is not necessarily a photograph taken that day.3
The headline establishes the newspaper's public framing of the moment. It does not establish the arrangements subsequently made for worship, policing, or administration on הר הבית HAR HAʾBAYIT. Nor does one edition describe the reactions of every Jewish reader, the city's Arab residents, or other religious communities. The political power signified by a flag and the policies exercised under it require separate evidence.
How is this dated?
The masthead in the reproduced page gives 7 June 1967, and its special-edition label states 16:30. The visible date agrees with Man's caption. TJD converts this daytime publication to 28 Iyar 5727 in the fixed Hebrew calendar. The placement records publication of this edition; it does not assign the reporter's every described action to 16:30. Calendar status is verified at publication-day precision from the dated facsimile. The reproduction is small and partial, so it does not support a complete article transcription.4
Guided reflections
- What meanings does Zion bring to a headline that an army-unit designation would not convey?
- How should a reader distinguish the symbolic claim of a wartime front page from decisions about administration and worship?
Footnotes
- Man,
הכותרות שעשו את המלחמה,
Maariv special-edition image, attachment titledמעריב דגל ציון.
The Hebrew H1 was checked against the reproduced page; the English is a TJD translation. The image shows the page's upper portion, not a complete issue. ↩ - Knesset, account of the liberation of Jerusalem, https://m.knesset.gov.il/en/about/pages/liberationofjerusalem1.aspx. ↩
- Man, same section. ↩
- Man,
הכותרות שעשו את המלחמה,
special-edition image, masthead at upper right and edition time at upper left. ↩
Works cited
- Man, Shlomo.
הכותרות שעשו את המלחמה
[The Headlines That Made the War]. The Seventh Eye, June 4, 2016. https://www.the7eye.org.il/205594. Maariv special-edition facsimile in the author’s original Naamoush blog, attachmentמעריב דגל ציון,
June 4, 2016: https://naamoush.wordpress.com/2016/06/01/הכותרות-שעשו-את-המלחמה/מעריב-דגל-ציון/.